In this post, we’re going to cover seven popular retirement withdrawal strategies, each with their own pros and cons. Whether you’re conservative and want to be absolutely sure you won’t run out of money, or you’re looking to maximize your spending early in retirement, there’s a strategy that fits your style.
1. The 4% Rule
The 4% Rule is one of the most commonly discussed withdrawal strategies. It’s simple: you withdraw 4% of your portfolio in your first year of retirement, then adjust that amount for inflation each year. This was based off historical data on the most you could withdraw and not run out of money in the worst case scenario.
How it works: Say you have a $1 million portfolio. In the first year, you’d withdraw $40,000. Each year, you increase that amount to keep pace with inflation.
Pros:
Very simple and easy to follow.
Provides a stable, predictable income stream.
Cons:
Doesn’t adapt to market conditions, which means you could run out of money if the market underperforms.
It’s based on a 30-year retirement, which might not be long enough for some retirees.
It’s a conservative approach, so it limits spending early in retirement.
Best for: Conservative retirees who want a stable, predictable income and don’t mind starting with a lower withdrawal rate.
2. The Ratcheting Rule
The Ratcheting Rule is similar to the 4% Rule but with a twist. You start with 4% like before, with the inflation adjustment, but if your portfolio performs well, you can increase your withdrawal.
How it works: After a few years, you’ll review your retirement plan. If your investments are doing well, you can increase your withdrawal amount, or “ratchet up.” Once you raise it, your new withdrawal rate becomes your baseline and won’t decrease. This approach is like the 4% rule but with the added benefit of being able to spend more if things go well, while still maintaining a high chance of your money lasting through retirement.
Pros:
Able to increase spending when your portfolio does well.
Very simple and easy to follow.
Provides a stable, predictable income stream.
Cons:
Still conservative and will result in lower spending early in retirement.
You need to review your portfolio regularly to see if you can adjust.
Best for: A good strategy for conservative savers who want to start small and spend more later if the market allows.
3. Fixed Percentage Withdrawals
With Fixed Percentage Withdrawals, you withdraw the same percentage of your portfolio every year, based on its current value.
How it works: For example, if you decide on a 5% withdrawal rate, you take 5% of your portfolio every year. If your portfolio is worth $1 million one year, you withdraw $50,000. If it’s worth $900,000 the next year, you withdraw $45,000.
Pros:
Automatically adjusts for market conditions, helping to protect your portfolio in down markets.
You won’t run out of money since you’re always taking a fixed percentage of the current value.
Cons:
Income will fluctuate, making budgeting harder.
There’s no inflation adjustment, so your purchasing power might decline over time in poor markets.
Best for: Retirees who are comfortable with flexible spending and have other sources of stable income (like Social Security or a pension) to cover essentials.
4. Critical Path Strategy
The Critical Path strategy is a more personalized, dynamic approach that adjusts withdrawals based on how your portfolio is performing compared to a predetermined “path” you set for your retirement.
How it works: You set a target portfolio value for each year of retirement. If your portfolio is performing better than expected, you can increase spending. If it’s underperforming, you reduce spending to get back on track.
Pros:
Highly customizable and flexible.
Helps you stay on track to avoid running out of money.
Increases spending early in retirement
Cons:
Complex to implement and requires ongoing monitoring.
Variable spending can make budgeting difficult.
No guaranteed inflation adjustment
Best for: Those who want a flexible approach tailored to their goals but are comfortable with some complexity.
5. Zolt’s Inflation Adjustment Rule
Zolt’s Rule combines the Critical Path with an inflation adjustment. If your portfolio is ahead of your expected path, you get an inflation adjustment for that year. If not, you don’t.
How it works: Each year, you check whether your portfolio is higher than the critical path. If it is, you get a raise (inflation adjustment). If it’s lower, no raise, but your spending doesn’t decrease.
Pros:
Simple to follow once you’ve set your critical path.
Retirees are more likely to stick with this approach since it avoids major cuts in spending.
Allows for more spending early in retirement.
Cons:
Requires calculating a critical path, which adds complexity.
Spending might not keep up with inflation during prolonged down markets.
Best for: Retirees who are okay with not always getting an inflation adjustment and prefer stable spending over big income swings.
6. Guardrails Strategy
The Guardrails Strategy is similar to the critical path approach but adds specific limits (or "guardrails") to control how much your portfolio can fluctuate before it impacts your withdrawals. It helps you adjust spending only when your portfolio moves significantly away from your plan.
How it works: You set upper and lower guardrails for your portfolio’s value. If your portfolio grows past the upper guardrail, you can increase spending. If it drops below the lower guardrail, you decrease spending to protect your savings.
Pros:
It lets you adjust spending like the critical path approach but less frequently, providing more stable income.
By cutting spending during tough market periods, you safeguard your savings for the future.
You can set your guardrails based on how comfortable you are with risk.
Cons:
You’ll need to keep an eye on your portfolio and make changes when it crosses a guardrail.
While it’s less frequent than other strategies, your income will still vary based on market performance.
Deciding where to set your guardrails and how to adjust when you pass them can be challenging.
Best for: Retirees comfortable with a more detailed strategy that helps ensure they won’t run out of money while still enjoying their savings during retirement.
7. Risk-Based Guardrails
Risk-Based Guardrails is an advanced version of the guardrail’s strategy. While traditional guardrails adjust withdrawals based on portfolio value alone, this approach factors in other elements like taxes, pension income, and changing retirement goals. It tracks your progress through a probability of success percentage for your retirement plan.
How it works: You set a target probability of success, like 80%. If your probability drops too far below this, say to 70%, you reduce withdrawals to get back on track. If your probability rises above the target, you can increase withdrawals. This method uses financial software to calculate probability based on various inputs like life expectancy, Social Security, pension income, future expenses, and portfolio risk.
Pros:
Accounts for your entire financial picture, including longevity risk, inflation, and all income sources.
You can set your probability target to match your goals—higher targets for conservative spending, lower targets to spend earlier on.
Adjusts for life changes, such as healthcare needs, new tax laws, or major one-time expenses like vacations or home renovations.
Cons:
Requires regular monitoring and software, which may require professional help to manage effectively.
Mistakes in assumptions can lead to withdrawing too much or too little, impacting your plan.
Best for: Retirees who prefer a detailed, data-driven approach to withdrawals and are comfortable with the complexity of regularly assessing their probability of success. Ideal for those seeking a comprehensive strategy that considers more than just portfolio performance.
Finding the Right Strategy for You
Choosing the right retirement withdrawal strategy depends on your financial situation, risk tolerance, and retirement goals.
Each strategy has its pros and cons, so take some time to think about what matters most to you in retirement. Do you want to maximize your spending early on, or are you more focused on making sure your money lasts 30+ years? Answering these questions will help you narrow down the best approach for your retirement.
Need help deciding? Reach out for a personalized retirement withdrawal plan that fits your lifestyle and goals!
Comments